Legal Opinion

Siekert v. Soester

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1944No. 31675PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

This is a partition suit. The question presented for decision is whether the- trial court erred in refusing to confirm the referee’s sale. Appellant, Henry Wohlers, was the highest bidder in the sum of $3,525. He deposited 15 per cent thereof with the referee, as required by the order of sale. The referee made report of the sale in writing to the court and moved for confirmation. Thereafter Henry A. Siekert, a plaintiff and one of the heirs, filed in the proceedings a higher bid of $3,800, attached to which was a cashier’s check for 15 per cent thereof payable to the referee. At the same time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Denton State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dawson County v. WhaleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State ex rel. Spillman v. American State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Bank v. GreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Kansas City Life Insurance v. NeverveNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. County of Lancaster v. SchwarzNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Rupe v. OldenburgNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Michelson v. WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hull v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. First National Bank v. First Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API