Application of Saul Kaye
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 1 of appellant’s patent application. 2 The issue presented is one of double patenting and, more particularly, the determinative question involves the effect of a terminal disclaimer filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 253.
Appellant discloses and claims a new sterilant which is said to be useful for inactivating or destroying all types of microorganisms, as well as larger organisms such as insects and their eggs and larvae. The claimed mixture includes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In re SiuCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of Norman B. ChristensenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by40 opinions
- Application of David G. BraithwaiteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Albert Bowers and James C. OrrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Douglas J. BridgefordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Lawrence A. HeinleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.