Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation v. Union Sanitary District, and A.P.T., Inc., a California Corp. D/B/A Calvert Environmental, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation appeals the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, holding all the claims of the patent in suit invalid on the basis of obviousness. 1 The district court did not reach the issues of infringement and inequitable conduct, deeming them mooted.
We conclude that summary judgment was improvidently granted, based on errors of law. Since material disputed facts require resolution, we reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand for trial.
Summary Judgment
The process of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Berwyn E. EtterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Park B. Smith, Inc. v. Chf Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. v. Biogenex Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Simpleair, Inc. v. Google LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Dr. David D. Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., and Jerome Goldstein, Ernest v. Groman and Lee JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.