Legal Opinion

In re Siu

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 22, 1955No. 6097PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of appellant’s application for a patent on / “Curled Glass Filaments and Methods of Making the Same.” Claim 5 was allowed. Only method claims are here on appeal.

Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter defined by the rejected claims and reads as follows:

1. A method of preparing filaments of glass characterized by causing molten glass to flow in a liquid stream to the vertex of a substantially cone-shaped, heated, rotating stream…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Underwood v. GerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Plax Corp. v. Elmer E. Mills Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. Application of Saul KayeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of David G. BraithwaiteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of Albert Bowers and James C. OrrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API