Parness v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
These appeals by plaintiffs question the propriety and form of, and the evidentiary justification for, the trial court’s submission of the issues of contributory negligence and assumption of risk to the jury as separate and distinct defenses in a personal injury action.
Plaintiff Gertrude Parness suffered a fractured hip when she slipped and fell on a floor covered with soapy water in the kitchen of a cafe in which she was employed. In this action she sought damages and her husband, plaintiff Samuel Parness, sought consequential damages against defendant, who supplied the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- White Ex Rel. White v. McVickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Schiro v. Oriental Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Evans v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Hubenette v. OstbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Moteberg v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Banovetz v. KingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.