State v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. Defendant was found guilty of the crime of aggravated robbery. He presented no testimony in defense to the charge at trial but now contends that he should have a reversal because of the court’s failure to suppress testimony of eyewitnesses to the offense.
It appears from the record that about 9:30 p. m. on the evening of January 20, 1968, defendant and his accomplice entered Sharrett’s Raymond Avenue Pharmacy in St. Paul. Present on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. SvobodaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.