Schiro v. Oriental Realty Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The first issue raised by the defendant on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence to sustain the jury’s finding that Mrs. Schiro was on her own property at the time she lost her balance and fell. It is defendant’s contention that Mrs. Schiro was walking at the time upon land owned by defendant. If this contention were found to be correct, then defendant would be entitled to judgment dismissing the complaint. This is because no duty exists on the part of a landowner toward a trespasser except to refrain from wilfully or wantonly injuring him. Nalepinski v. Durner (1951), 259…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McFarlane v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Walley v. PatakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Ovig v. MorrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Sturm v. Simpson's Garment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Frei v. FreiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Marshall v. RanneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Raisanen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.