Legal Opinion

Caspersen v. Town of Lyme

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 27, 1995No. 92-070PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiffs, Finn M.W. Caspersen and Barbara M. Caspersen, trustees, appeal a decision of the Superior Court (Perkins, J.) upholding the validity of a zoning ordinance enacted by the defendant, Town of Lyme (town). On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that a provision in the ordinance that prohibits lot sizes of less than fifty acres in a mountain and forest district: (1) violates their substantive due process and equal protection rights under the State and Federal Constitutions; (2) is exclusionary; (3) violates New Hampshire’s controlled growth statutes; and (4) was improperly adopted. We…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. State v. MayaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quirk v. Town of New BostonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Morgenstern v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. Dow v. Town of EffinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Boulders at Strafford, LLC v. Town of StraffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Goldstein v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API