Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
delivered the opinion of the Court.. When this case was here the last time,1 we held that the acquisition of Pacific Northwest Pipeline Corporation by El Paso Natural Gas.Company violated § 7 of the Clayton Act; and we directed the District Court “to order divestiture without delay.” United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 376 U. S. 651, 662. That was on April 6, 1964. It is now nearly three years later , and, as we shall see, no divestiture in any meaningful sense has been directed. The United States, now an appellee, maintains that the issues respecting divestiture are not *132before us. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- California v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by255 opinions
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.