Grooms v. Supporting Council of Preventative Effort
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
{¶ 1} John Grooms appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against him and in favor of appellee Supporting Council of Preventative Effort (“SCOPE”) on his state-law claims of race discrimination, disability discrimination, and wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.
{¶ 2} Grooms advances three assignments of error on appeal. First, he contends that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against him on his race-discrimination claim. Second, he argues that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against him on his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James v. Bob Ross Buick, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Courie v. AlcoaOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Witte v. Rippe & Kingston Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Mitchell v. Lemmie, 21511 (10-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Beery v. Associated Hygienic Products, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.