Legal Opinion

Mendlovic v. Life Line Screening of America, Ltd.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2007No. 88850PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James J. Sweeney, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Nata Mendlovic, appeals from a decision of the common pleas court that granted defendants-appellees, Life Line Screening of America, Ltd., Colin Scully, Timothy Phillips, David Campbell, and Dome Chadsey’s (collectively referred to as “Life Line”) motion for summary judgment on Mendlovic’s claims. Upon review, we conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that Life Line is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Mendlovic’s claims. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

{¶ 2} A review of the record…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Craddock v. the Flood Co., 23882 (1-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Jones v. Wheelersburg Local School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Karsnak v. Chess Fin. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Spitulski v. Bd. of Educ. of the Toledo City Sch. Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Kanu v. Univ. of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API