Legal Opinion
Britschgi v. McCall
California Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1953No. S. F. 18578; S. F. 18579; S. F. 18580PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
These appeals are from judgments for the defendants in three consolidated actions arising out of the failure to perform a contract for the sale of real property in Santa Clara County. William and Betty McCall are the defendants in each action and are the owners of the real property. The plaintiff in S. F. No. 18578, Francis Britschgi. is a real estate broker who seeks damages for the asserted breach by the defendants of an agreement by which the broker was granted the exclusive right to sell the realty. The plaintiffs in S. F. No. 18579 are Britschgi and Thomas, a second real estate broker.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cutting Packing Co. v. Packers' ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Waverly Productions, Inc. v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kopf v. MilamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- McKeon v. Santa Claus of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Scott v. MullinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.