Kopf v. Milam
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
In this action for a real estate commission, cross-complainant, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, appeals from a judgment for cross-defendants, hereinafter referred to as defendants. The appeal on the clerk’s transcript and certain exhibits is treated as an appeal on the judgment roll (White v. Jones, 136 Cal.App.2d 567, 569 [288 P.2d 913]), and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings is therefore not open to question.
Plaintiff sought to recover his commission on the ground that he had secured a purchaser after defendants listed their property with him doing business as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- White v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Edwards v. BillowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Krueger v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Drake v. HosleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Allen v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- R. J. Kuhl Corp. v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Crummer v. ZalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.