Clopton v. Chandler
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The purpose of this proceeding, brought under section 315 of the Civil Code, was to set aside the election of the defendant Harry Chandler as a director of the Los Angeles Investment Company, a corporation, and in place of Chandler to have one I. J. Huma declared elected as such director. A general demurrer interposed by defendants to the second amended complaint was sustained, and plaintiffs declining to further amend, judgment was entered in favor of defendants. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll.
Stripped of a vast amount of surplusage, conclusions, and matter that in no event could be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boyson v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HohmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Glenn v. California Trona Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Morrical v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Washington State Labor Council v. Federated American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Washington State Labor Council v. Federated American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1970