Legal Opinion

Glenn v. California Trona Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1918No. Civ. No. 2381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLY, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought to annul an assessment on the corporate stock of the California Trona Company, and to vacate the sale of delinquent stock belonging to the plaintiffs. The action was begun in May, 1912. A third amended complaint was filed on May 3, 1915. Demurrers by the defendants to this third amended complaint were sustained on April 21, 1916, and judgment was entered on April 25, 1916. The appeal is taken from that judgment.

One of the attacks upon the assessment made in the third amended complaint was based upon the allegation that the board of directors which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buena Vista Fruit & Vineyard Co. v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dolbear v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Clopton v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Von Horst v. American Hop & Barley Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watson v. Santa Carmelita Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Koshaba v. KoshabaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Ferguson v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Korkman v. Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API