Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Upon further consideration of this case in Bank, we are satisfied with the opinion rendered in Department, and, with the conclusion therein reached, and for the reasons given in said opinion, the judgment is affirmed. Fitzgerald, J., McFarland, J., Van Fleet, J., Garoutte, J.
Beatty, C. J , dissented.
*360The following is the opinion above referred to, rendered in Department One on the 27th of February, 1894.
Haynes, C.
Plaintiff had judgment, and the defendants appeal therefrom upon the judgment-roll.
This proceeding was brought under section 315 of the Civil Code, to set aside the election…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Simpson v. NielsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Clopton v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Ramos v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Garnier v. GarnierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967