State v. Hohmann
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
248 S.W.2d 49 (1952)
STATE ex rel. DUNBAR et al.
v.
HOHMANN et al.
No. 28298.
St. Louis Court of Appeals. Missouri.
April 15, 1952.
Edward W. Tobin, Edward A. Haid, St. Louis, for appellants.
Thomas Rowe Schwarz and Dunbar & Curby, all of St. Louis, for respondents.
WOLFE, Commissioner.
The relators in this action sought a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to declare that James V. Dunbar had been elected a director of the Sieloff Packing Company. It was alleged in relators' petition that Dunbar had been elected on June 8, 1949, to serve as one of the corporate directors for a term of one…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gentry-Futch Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Chilcutt v. ThatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- State ex rel. Metcalf v. GarescheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Hurtgen v. GascheMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Crites v. ShortSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hand v. BilyeuMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Razorback Cab of Fort Smith, Inc. v. LingoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Weber v. VossbrinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Brentmoor Place Residents Ass'n v. WarrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. CTS Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.