Legal Opinion

Piotrowski v. Parks

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 30, 1984No. 6752-8-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.

— Defendant, Parks, appeals a judgment quieting title to a strip of land in plaintiff, Piotrowski. The essential issue is whether Parks and Piotrowski's predecessor in interest, Sawyer, effectively executed an oral agreement to establish the boundary between the parties' properties. We hold that Parks and Sawyer did so agree and effectively marked that boundary so as to preclude Piotrowski from successfully claiming ownership to the presently disputed strip. Accordingly, we reverse with direction to dismiss Piotrowski's complaint to quiet title.

It is undisputed that some time prior to 1973…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lamm v. McTigheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bowers v. LedgerwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Rose v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Johnston v. MonahanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James And Holly Kave, V Mcintosh Ridge Primary Road AssocCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Levien v. FialaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Carter v. HanrathCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Sila v. SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Steinherz v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API