Legal Opinion

Sila v. Saunders

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2008No. S-06-1160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Aaron Sila brought this action under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 34-301 (Reissue 2004) to establish the east boundary line of his property adjoining the property of the defendant, Kirk Saunders. Sila sought to establish the boundary line in accordance with the original government survey. Kirk asserted that under theories of mutual acquiescence and adverse possession, the historically recognized boundary should instead be acknowledged.

BACKGROUND

The properties in issue were once part of a single 78-acre farm owned by Kirk’s grandfather, Fred Saunders. Fred owned and farmed the land from the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wanha v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Petsch v. WidgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Converse v. KenyonNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Spilinek v. SpilinekNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Babel v. SchmidtNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Bush Island v. KortumNebraska Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Dzingle v. KrcilekNebraska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API