Carter v. Hanrath
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
Defendant Shirley Hanrath appeals the trial court’s decision awarding a disputed area of land to an adjoining land owner, plaintiff Royden V. Carter, based on the legal doctrine of boundary by acquiescence. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
This case concerns a dispute over ownership of a portion of land situated between two parcels about eighteen miles northwest of Duchesne, Utah. The 160-acre northern parcel was purchased by Barbara Shrader (Shrader) in 1961. About 80 percent of the parcel is located on a plateau above and to the north of the Duchesne River, while about 20 percent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. FinlinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Staker v. AinsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Halladay v. CluffUtah Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gillmor v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- Carter v. HanrathUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Wilkinson Family Farm, LLC v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Chipman v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Anderson v. FautinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.