Legal Opinion

Ross v. Griswold

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1920No. 10,469PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Howard Circuit Court; William C. Overton, Judge. Action by William Griswold against Walter L. Ross, receiver. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, C. J.

Appellee recovered judgment for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by appellee while in the employ of appellant as railroad brakeman. The only question properly presented for consideration by this court, and not specifically waived by appellant at the time of the oral argument, are those presented by the alleged error of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial.

1. 2. Among the reasons for a new trial urged by appellant is the action of the court in suppressing certain depositions. The motion to suppress was not made before, but during the progress of,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hazlett v. GamboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Atkins v. HumesSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Funk v. BonhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Huber v. Protestant Deaconess Hospital, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. McClure v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Brown v. SwindalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API