Legal Opinion

Funk v. Bonham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1932No. 26,230PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTravis, J.

This is an action on contract (Staley v. Jameson [1874], 46 Ind. 159; Goble v. Dillon [1882], 86 Ind. 327; Lane v. Boicourt [1891], 128 Ind. 420, 27 N. E. 1111, 25 Am. St. Rep. 442), by appellee against the appellant, wherein appellee seeks to recover damages from appellant on account of injuries sustained by the appellee while a patient under the care and treatment of the appellant. The complaint is presented by appellee’s complaint in one paragraph, the sufficiency of which was in no manner questioned by appellant. Appellant pleaded the general issue. The cause was submitted to and tried to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Davis v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Barnett's Administrator v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Lane v. BoicourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sanzari v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Grant v. Touro InfirmarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  5. Wright v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API