Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Humes

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 1, 1959PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

110 So.2d 663 (1959)

Frank B. ATKINS and Rebecca Atkins, an infant, by Frank B. Atkins, her father and next friend, Petitioners,

v.

Karl T. HUMES, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1, 1959.

Rehearing Denied May 4, 1959.

Dayton, Dayton & Luckie and Norma Jean Wagner, Dade City, for petitioner.

P.B. Howell, Bushnell, and Savage & Mills, Ocala, for respondent.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This cause is before the court on certiorari granted to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District — Atkins v. Humes, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 253, 256 — affirming a summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Christie v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. Crovella v. CochraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kukral v. MekrasSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Public Health Trust of Dade Cty. v. ValcinSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Hart Properties, Inc. v. SlackSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. Boxberger v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API