Legal Opinion

Hazlett v. Gambold

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam, Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellee, who was the plaintiff, sued the appellants for hogs-sold and delivered, and for money paid, &c. There was a verdict for the plaintiff; upon which the Court, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment. During the trial, the plaintiff offered to read in' evidence to’ the jury, the depositions of Thomson Parle, John Whetstone,, and Elijah Parle; to the reading of which the defendants objected, on the ground that these witnesses all resided in the county of Montgomery, a county adjoining that in which the cause was then being tried: and at the same time, they, the defendants,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Ross v. GriswoldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Wehrs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Yellow Cab Co. v. KuryczakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API