Legal Opinion

W T Andrew Co. v. Mid-State Surety Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1995No. Docket 159064PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Mid-State Surety Corporation appeals as of right from a November 12, 1992, judgment for plaintiff, W.T. Andrew Company, Inc. We reverse.

This is a dispute between a materials supplier, plaintiff, and a surety company, Mid-State, concerning plaintiffs claim under a labor and material payment bond issued by Mid-State 2 to the general contractor, A. Z. Shmina & Sons. The University of Michigan had contracted with Shmina to perform renovations on its Dearborn campus. Marino Mechanical Contractor Company was one of the subcontractors on the project that obtained supplies from plaintiff.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Adam v. Sylvan Glynn Golf CourseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. William C Reichenbach Co. v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Spruytte v. OwensMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Royalite Co. v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. WT ANDREW COMPANY v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. WT Andrew Co. v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. W T Andrew Co. v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. W. T. Andrew Co. v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API