W. T. Andrew Co. v. Mid-State Surety Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
after remand
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, W. T. Andrew Company, Inc., was a sub-subcontractor on a construction project at the University of Michigan—Dearborn. It seeks to enforce a claim under the public works bond act. The circuit court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff has twice been reversed by the Court of Appeals, whose judgment we now affirm.
i
When this case was before us in 1996, we set forth the facts:
In May of 1989, the University of Michigan decided to renovate buildings at its Dearborn campus. In order to facilitate this project, it hired A. Z. Shmina & Sons, a general contracting firm. Shmina…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Taylor v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Weinberg v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- WT ANDREW COMPANY v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Ruvayn Rubinstein v. Temple Israel Early Learning CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018