Legal Opinion
Royalite Co. v. Federal Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1990No. Docket 114174PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCynar, J.
Defendant appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting plaintiff summary disposition on its construction bond claim. We affirm.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. Granger Construction Company was the primary con-
*71tractor on a project involving the construction of the Genesee County jail. As required by the Michigan public works bond act, MCL 129.201 et seq.; MSA 5.2321(1) et seq., Granger furnished a payment bond, issued by defendant as surety, for the protection of certain claimants supplying labor or materials for the project. MCL 129.201, 129.203; MSA 5.2321(1), 5.2321(3).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hardy v. MaxheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Adamo Equipment Rental Co. v. MacK Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Pi-Con, Inc v. A. J. Anderson Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- SQUARE D. ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. v. Aero Mechanical, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Trustees for Michigan Laborers' Health Care Fund v. Warranty Builders, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- W T Andrew Co. v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- W T Andrew Co. v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.