Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Atlantic Greyhound Lines
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The trial court instructed the jury with respect to the mortuary table as follows: “So the court instructs you, by referring to the mortuary table of the statute, that the expectancy of a person 59 years of age would be fourteen and sevem-tenths years.” This was assigned as error, and the Superior Court sustained the exception. The ruling is supported by the decisions in Taylor v. Construction Co., 193 N. C., 775, 138 S. E., 129, and Hubbard v. R. R., 203 N. C., 675, 166 S. E., 802.
The use of the mortuary table seems quite easily misunderstood. It is competent as evidence, but only “as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Williams v. . Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Taylor v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Cogdill v. Boice Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hancock v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Bethea v. Town of KenlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Starnes v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- McClamroch v. Colonial Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.