Legal Opinion
Cogdill v. Boice Hardwood Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 21, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stagy, O. J.
There are two exceptive assignments of error appearing on tbe record wbicb make it necessary to remand tbe cause for another bearing.
On tbe issue of negligence tbe jury was instructed as follows:
“If you find by tbe evidence that be is permanently injured and bis earning capacity has been decreased by reason of bis injury, and if you find bis neck is stiff, permanently stiff, be would be entitled to recover for tbe decreased earning power to make money, if you find that be was injured by tbe piece of ice falling down tbe side of tbe mountain and bitting him on tbe shoulder, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . HarbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- State v. . KlineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Starnes v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. . GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Atlantic Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.