Legal Opinion
In Re Application for Discipline of Rerat
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 11, 1950No. 34,475PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Disciplinary proceedings upon the petition of the Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association, referred to hereinafter as petitioner, for the discipline of Eugene A. Rerat as attorney at law, referred to hereinafter as respondent.
The matter was duly referred by an order of this court, dated October 15, 1947, to the Honorable Rol E. Barron, judge of the district court of the seventh judicial district, as referee to take testimony in the proceedings and report the same to this court, together with findings of fact. Thereafter, the referee caused…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Disbarment of John D. GreathouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Application of Smith for Reinstatement as AttorneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- In Re Disbarment of Robert J. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- In Re Application for Discipline of Eugene A. ReratSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- State Board of Examiners in Law v. DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Matter of Discipline of AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Matter of DoeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
- In Re Application for Discipline of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.