Legal Opinion
In Re Application for Discipline of Eugene A. Rerat
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 6, 1947No. 34,475PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 28 N.W.2d 168. Respondent's blended motion to strike certain portions of petitioner's allegations and to make others more specific is accompanied by another motion for an order suspending Rule IV of the Rules of Practice of this court (222 Minn. xxx) in order to permit oral argument on the above blended motion, and for a further order granting an extension of time in which to answer the petition and accusation in these disciplinary proceedings.
Petitioner, the Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association, has filed with this court a petition and, accusation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In re Disciplinary Action Against GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Complaint Concerning KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.