Legal Opinion

Barton v. Tombari

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1922No. 16974PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHovey, J.

—On June 1, 1920, appellant entered into a contract with the respondents for the purchase of a lot in the city of Spokane, upon which were situate two dwelling houses. The contract price was $4,000, and of this $700 was paid upon the execution of the contract and the balance was payable in installments. The contract does not contain any time essence provision nor any other provision for forfeiture, nor any provision making all payments due upon default in one *332or more payments, but merely provides that, upon full payment being made, deed shall be delivered; and the deed and a copy of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Lewis v. . DuaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Pomeroy v. PrescottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  4. Taylor v. Interstate Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Jones v. GroveWashington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fite v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Morgan v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Stevens v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Grossman v. WillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API