Legal Opinion

Tungsten Products, Inc. v. Kimmel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1940No. 27897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

The defendants, Offa M. Kimmel, Mabel Kimmel, Keturah C. Kimmel, A. W. Kemp, and J. M. Fitzpatrick, are the owners, as tenants in common, of mining contracts or leases to certain state lands in Stevens county. July 28, 1938, the defendants entered into a contract for the sale of their interests to plaintiff. Plaintiff paid two thousand dollars in cash upon the contract price of one hundred and fifty-two thousand dollars. The balance was to be paid out of royalties from the proceeds of sales of minerals extracted from the property. Among the covenants undertaken by plaintiff was one to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hamilton v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Jones v. GroveWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lonnqvist v. LammiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Penrose v. Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carr v. DekingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. McGill v. ShugartsWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Fairview Lumber Co. v. MakosWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gooden v. HunterWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Wilson v. KatzerWashington Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API