Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wisner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 1906No. Nos. 9, 10, OriginalPublishedCited by 202 opinions

PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND OF PROHIBITION. Abram C. Wisner, a citizen of the State of Michigan, commenced an action at law, on February 17, a. d. 1906, in the Circuit Court in and for the city of St. Louis and State of Missouri, against John D. Beardsley, a citizen of the State of Louisiana, by filing a petition, together with an affidavit, on which that court issued a writ of attachment, in the usual form, directed to the sheriff of St. Louis.

Read the full summary

PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND OF PROHIBITION. Abram C. Wisner, a citizen of the State of Michigan, commenced an action at law, on February 17, a. d. 1906, in the Circuit Court in and for the city of St. Louis and State of Missouri, against John D. Beardsley, a citizen of the State of Louisiana, by filing a petition, together with an affidavit, on which that court issued a writ of attachment, in the usual form, directed to the sheriff of St. Louis. The sheriff returned no property found, but that he had garnisheed the Mississippi Valley Trust Company, a corporation of Missouri, and also…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

By Article III of the Constitution the judicial power of the United States was “vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”

• And the judicial power wa,s extended “to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority; to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls; to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; to'controversies -to which the United States shall be a. party; to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Sheldon v. SillSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
  5. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by202 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. In the Matter of Emanuel JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  4. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API