Legal Opinion

St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1920No. 10,671PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action for personal injuries by Aaron Jones against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This suit was commenced by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, in the district court of Oklahoma county, on January 16, 1918, for the recovery of damages in the sum of $3,000; and upon a trial thereof to the court and jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500.

The defendant filed a timely motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the court and a judgment rendered upon the verdict of the jury, to reverse which this proceeding in error was regularly commenced in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Felton v. AubreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Littlejohn v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Wilhelm v. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Figueroa Lugo v. American Railroad Co. of Porto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
  2. Folsom Morris Coal Mining Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Davis v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PedigoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API