Flynn v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the theft of property over the value of $50, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of seven years; hence this appeal.
The court did not err in refusing to quash the indictment. The indictment was in two counts, one of which charged theft from the person, and the other theft of property over the value of $50. While they were different offenses, yet it was competent to charge them in distinct counts in the same indictment. Greenwood v. State, 44 S. W. Rep., 177.
We do not believe it was error for the court to refuse…
2Cited by13 opinions
- People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- In re JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. BrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Glascow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Bink v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.