Bink v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the theft of property from M. S. Holder, over the value of $50, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years; hence this appeal.
Appellant made a motion for a change of venue based on both phases of the statute, to wit: that there was so great a prejudice in the county as that he could not get a fair and impartial trial, and that there existed in the county a formidable combination of influential citizens, etc. This was contested by the State and a good deal of evidence adduced pro and con on the subject.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Shuman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Flynn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- State v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1857
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Akers v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Luttrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.