Legal Opinion

In re Jones

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1912No. 3,226PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Application for writ of habeas corpus by Maude Jones.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

Habeas corpas. The complainant was committed to the custody of the defendant after a preliminary examination had before a justice of the peace of Yellowstone county, upon a complaint charging her with grand larceny. The application for the writ was presented to, and was heard by, the Justices in chambers. The ground. alleged is that the evidence submitted at the preliminary hearing does not show reasonable or probable cause for belief that the complainant is guilty of the crime charged, or any crime of which the district court has jurisdiction.

The complaint under which the complainant was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Edelhoff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Carl v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Esgar v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. EnglandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. In re McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API