Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dalkin v. Guilford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 1934No. 30,163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before us upon an alternative writ of mandamus whereby the relator seeks a peremptory writ requiring Judge Guil-ford of the district court of Hennepin county to extend the time within which to settle a case and requiring him to settle such case.

January 22, 1931, the relator commenced an action in the district court of Hennepin coiinty against Benjamin Lifson and the Oak Grove Apartments Holding Company to recover a commission in a real estate deal. The case finally came to trial February 9, 1933, and on February 22 of that year the jury returned a verdict in favor of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Driscoll v. EnersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Stevens v. FritzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Vessel v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Hartman v. Phoenix Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Loftsgaarden v. ReilingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API