Legal Opinion

Loftsgaarden v. Reiling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1963No. 38,939Published

1Per curiam

Certiorari to review an order of the trial court dated November 7, 1962, denying plaintiff’s motion for an order “settling” a case for purposes of appeal to this court. Plaintiff’s action against defendant is one for libel, an outgrowth of the facts involved in Hammersten v. Reiling, 262 Minn. 200, 115 N. W. (2d) 259.

On May 11, 1961, the jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Therein it found that he had suffered no general or compensatory damages as a result of defendant’s libel, but awarded him punitive damages in the sum of $5,000. On November 6, 1961, on motion of defendant, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meixner v. BueckslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Township of Island LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Hammersten v. ReilingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. State ex rel. Sylte v. PowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API