Stevens v. Fritzen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $148 upon a promissory note. The answer alleged that defendant conducted a small grocery store and the agent of Donald-Richard Company represented to him it wished to place and display In his store a case of perfumes and toilet articles; that all the statements of the agent in regard to the printed paper which defendant was asked to sign were false and were made for the purpose of inducing him to sign it; that the…
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $148 upon a promissory note. The answer alleged that defendant conducted a small grocery store and the agent of Donald-Richard Company represented to him it wished to place and display In his store a case of perfumes and toilet articles; that all the statements of the agent in regard to the printed paper which defendant was asked to sign were false and were made for the purpose of inducing him to sign it; that the goods subsequently delivered were not according to the sample exhibited but were in fact worthless trash. On information…
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed on October 8, 1917:
2Per curiam
Motion to strike the settled case from the record. The facts are as follows:
There was a directed verdict for plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was denied March 1, 1917, and the order served on defendant’s attorneys on the same day. March 9 it was stipulated that proceedings he stayed until March 23. Judgment was entered on March 24. July 25 defendant moved for a rehearing of the motion for a new trial, and asked an order reinstating and extending the stay. This motion was heard on the afternoon of July 30 and denied. On the morning of that…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Stevens v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Van Brunt & Wilkins Manufacturing Co. v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
4Cited by3 opinions
- Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- State v. Independent School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Dalkin v. GuilfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934