Legal Opinion

Vessel v. Greenlee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1959No. 37,790PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter arises upon an alternative writ of mandamus whereby relator seeks a peremptory writ requiring a judge of the district court to extend the time within which to settle a case and requiring him to settle such case.

In September 1956 plaintiff-relator commenced an action to recover from defendants, her brothers and sisters, reimbursement for moneys she had spent during the previous 12 years for the maintenance, care, and support of the mother of said plaintiff and defendants. Defendants Clara V. Klodd, Edward Vessel, and Robert Vessel (the latter individually and as executor of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Elsen v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Driscoll v. EnersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Dalkin v. GuilfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Hemza v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. State v. Independent School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API