Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Morgensen Motors
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 23, 1982No. 1 CA-CIV 5542PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
This is an appeal by Morgensen Motors (“Morgensen”) from the trial court’s denial of Morgensen’s motion for new trial and to set aside judgment.
On April 13, 1979, Leonard N. Roberts and Charlotte B. Roberts, filed a complaint against Morgensen alleging breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, negligence, rescission, fraud, and consumer fraud. The Roberts asserted that the car they bought from Morgensen contained numerous defects.
After trial to the court rescission was granted in favor of the Roberts, plus incidental damages for interest. Counsel for the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Beal v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Mary P. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, Non-Aligned PartyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Ford Motor Co. v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Gilbert v. Monaco Coach Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Wendling v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- ABC Supply, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Matos v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.