Gilbert v. Monaco Coach Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARNES, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [27] AND plaintiffs Motion for Oral Argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment [29]. The Court has reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and, for the reasons set out below, concludes that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [27] should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, AND plaintiffs Motion for Oral Argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment [29] should be DENIED.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of plaintiffs’ purchase of a recreational…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mesa v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Owens v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
- David v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Ocana v. Ford Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Stoebner Motors, Inc. v. Automobili Lamborghini S.P.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.