Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Monaco Coach Corp.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 9, 2004No. CIV.A.1:03CV00328JECPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARNES, District Judge.

This case is presently before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [27] AND plaintiffs Motion for Oral Argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment [29]. The Court has reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and, for the reasons set out below, concludes that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [27] should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, AND plaintiffs Motion for Oral Argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment [29] should be DENIED.

BACKGROUND

This case arises out of plaintiffs’ purchase of a recreational…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mesa v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Owens v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
  3. David v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  4. Ocana v. Ford Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Stoebner Motors, Inc. v. Automobili Lamborghini S.P.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API