Legal Opinion
Matos v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 26, 1993No. 2 CA-CV 92-0183PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Presiding Judge.
This appeal challenges an adverse summary judgment on appellants’ claims against the City of Phoenix for handicap and age discrimination in violation of the Arizona Civil Rights Act. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2101(B).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellants Matos and Daye each served as police officers for the city for more than 20 years. During the course of their respective employments, both developed physical disabilities. The city accommodated each man’s physical limitations by assigning him to the light-duty position of call-back…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- James Paul Doherty, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Southern College of Optometry, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Higdon v. Evergreen International Airlines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ensslin v. Township of North BergenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Bogue v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Madden-Tyler v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- St. Luke's v. State, Dept. of LawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Ransom v. State of Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.