Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Crist

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1998No. OSB 97-18; SC S30840PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar (the Bar) charged the accused by formal complaint with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 6-101(B) (neglecting a legal matter), 1 DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), 2 and DR 1-103(C) (failing to cooperate during disciplinary investigation). 3 The accused was served personally with a copy of the complaint and notice to answer. He failed to file an answer or to make any appearance throughout these proceedings.

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board entered an order finding the accused in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Goger v. United States (In Re Janmar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RhodesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WorthOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KolihaOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re GraeffOregon Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API