In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Crist
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar (the Bar) charged the accused by formal complaint with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 6-101(B) (neglecting a legal matter), 1 DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), 2 and DR 1-103(C) (failing to cooperate during disciplinary investigation). 3 The accused was served personally with a copy of the complaint and notice to answer. He failed to file an answer or to make any appearance throughout these proceedings.
A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board entered an order finding the accused in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Goger v. United States (In Re Janmar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RhodesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WorthOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KolihaOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In re GraeffOregon Supreme Court · 2021