Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Koliha

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2000No. OSB 96-179; SC S45209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused by formal complaint with violating ORS 9.160 (engaging in the unlawful practice of law), 1 Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), 2 DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), 3 DR 3-101(B) (engaging in the unlawful practice of law), 4 and DR 1-103(C) (failing to cooperate during disciplinary investigation). 5 The accused was served personally with a copy of the complaint and notice to answer. She…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Graham (In Re Graham)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1980
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re WhippleOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Amended January 23, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API