Legal Opinion

Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 17, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-04450-RSPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MARS INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

That children and forced laborers pick cocoa beans,on a daily basis is indisputably an international tragedy. The debatable question is whether defendants Mars, Inc., and Mars Chocolate North America, LLC, must inform consumers at the point of sale that Mars chocolate products likely contain cocoa beans picked under such conditions. Plaintiff Robert Hodsdon claims that California law obligates Mars to disclose that information on its labels and seeks to mandate such…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re Vizio, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  2. Stewart v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. In re Seagate Technology LLC LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Pemberton v. Nationstar Mortg. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API