Legal Opinion
Hill v. Blevins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 1, 2005No. 100,504PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
¶ 1 The issue before us is whether the appellant, Howard Lee Hill, Jr., is barred by the statute of limitations from pursuing his paternity claims against the appellees, Heather Diane Blevins and D.S., an infant. We hold that his two causes, combined in the trial court, are barred by the statute of limitations.
¶2 Appellant filed two petitions in the District Court of Kay County. The first, titled “Petition to Establish Paternity,” asks that the court require genetic testing of the parties to determine paternity of D.S., who was born out of wedlock. The second petition, titled “Petition to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Matthewson v. HiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Matter of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Marshall v. Fenton, Fenton, Smith, Reneau & Moon, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- SUTTON v. DAVID STANLEY CHEVROLETSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- B.A.P., L.L.P. v. PearmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Young v. State ex rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.