Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Fenton, Fenton, Smith, Reneau & Moon, P.C.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1995No. 78688PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, Justice:

SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In October of 1983, Vaughn and Rene Marshall, appellants, engaged the law firm of Fenton, Fenton, Smith, Reneau & Moon and attorney Tom Mullen, appellees, to represent Vaughn Marshall in a guardianship proceeding for his grandmother. Marshall was appointed guardian during that same month. The grandmother died shortly thereafter. Attorney Mullen and the firm continued to represent Marshall both as administrator of his grandmother’s estate and as guardian of his father until June 13,1985, when Marshall was discharged. As of that date,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Martin v. Griffin Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. MBA Commercial Construction, Inc. v. Roy J. Hannaford Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Funnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Markwell v. Whinery's Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stephens v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Mansell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Hill v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API